Astrodust on 15 November 2007
| ckmlb said: Sony smearing campaign continues? Why do Variety reviews matter again? Also technically he's right about the graphics, but the point has very little relevance since we know Wii has less power than the other two and this wouldn't even factor into a gamer's review (SMG reviews from real game sources praise the graphics), but to an outsider like mr variety here the graphics will look 'worse' than things on PS3 or 360. It's like comparing the special effects of an artsy indie movie to Transformers, what's the point? Did I go to see special effects in the indie movie? Not to mention a little thing called artistic direction in games especially stylized games like Mario and Ratchet. So even though Viva Pinata might technically have better graphics than SMG, Mario still looks better in my opinion. In conclusion this review has nothing to do with the reviewer being pro Sony or anti Nintendo but with the fact that he's not a gamer and he's comparing graphics from a technical standpoint which is inapplicable here. |
I actually agree with clmlb for once. This is gonna be a strange day. Good points btw. I have to say, I wasn't really hyped for Galaxy. I got it cause the reviews were good. I bought it, took it home, had some food, and then played it for about half an hour. It wasn't until I went back to it the next day that it dawned on me how much fun I was having.
