Slimebeast said:
See my post above, about neglecting the evidence. In short I am saying that since I dont believe in the concept of randomness, I obviously assume there's other explanations or hidden factors when the tests from the quantum level appears to show evidence of randomness. I dont mean current CPUs. I mean the theory that the brain is just a network of neurons with electric activity, in essence just like a computer, and it could all be simulated in a (future) computer (which mimics neuronal networks instead of linear threads that current CPUs process)- assuming that computer had access to input of stimuli of course (senses of smelling, hearing, seeing etc).
|
There aren't just tests with experimental errors that show evidence of randomness, there's a mathematical equation, theoretical, without error. It's called Bell's Theorem, which basically says that unless information can travel faster than speed of light (contradicts general relativity), no hidden variable is responsible for the randomness in quantum mechanics.
As for CPUs, of course you're talking about current CPUs! You yourself said that you observed and compared a computer to a human brain, and deducted that since the computer can't have feelings, our soul is independant from our physical self. Unless you had access to a CPU from future, my point stands.








