I tried that(I'm talking about your first post here, not your second), couldn't find anything that says anything about nuclear effects after nuclear bombs were dropped being over exaggerated.
So what you're saying is that the government would never say that it was over exaggerated because they need to get elected? That's true, but why would they fund a study that says so then(and if the study didn't show the result they wanted then why did they publish it?) And why haven't I ever heard of this study? I watch the news everyday and I read the news paper every day yet I have never heard of this study. If it's that important shouldn't it have been on the news then?
I'm willing to believe you here, I just need more articles claiming this.
Edit: I've googled the name you gave me and the first link show a book about Nuclear weapons, but it dates back from 1972. I don't know if it's this book you mean, but I wouldn't completly trust a scientific book that's over 30 years old. I'll try the databanks of my university, I have a better change of finding something decent there. I can access pretty much every english and french written books/etc online, so I'll probably find something if it's true.
