What's the most Sony biased third-party?

[peachbuggy]

Dgc1808 said:
Capcom goes where the money is at. SONY got the exclusives when they were clearly market leader. Now it's multiplats for capcom.

If you're talking publishers I'd rule out:

Square Enix[look at where there games are going this gen]

Namco [SONY only get's exclusive from them because SONY has stake in that company]

Capcom [Above reasons]

Activision [Uhhh...]

Ubisoft [I just don't see it]

Konami [Really, they only make reasonable decisions with where they put their games. MGS4 was just the company letting Kojima call a few shots and Kojima wanting to keep his fans happy]

Lucas Arts [I just don't see it]

Atari [They lay things out pretty even]

Take-Two [Just haven't seen much from them. Their's Agent, but really just one game...]

Microsoft [Listed for the lulz]

Bethesda [Late DLC, weaker ports]

Warner Bros. [They like Blu-Ray , no special attention to the PS3 though ]

MTV Games [Lol]

THQ [HD or Wii dev]

Midway [Multiplat Dev]

Disney [Seem to favor the Wii]

This leaves:

Atlus [Seems to like the PSP alot. Also they don't mind pleasing a few PS3 fans]
NiS [their games go to either PS3 or PSP, rarely DS]
Level-5 [Their games to to PS3 or handhelds]
SEGA [One of few companies willing to dish out some PS3 Exclusives]
Tecmo Koei [Sigma/2, Quantum... Just the fact that they show so much interest in the System]
Gust [Altus like reasons]

Didn't know Sony had a stake in Capcom and Namco. I thought Nintendo had a stake in Bandai when they were independent. Would be quite amusing if both Sony and Nintendo had a stake in Namco.