By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran said:

US commonly being good guys in their work?! Seriously go back to your history books please, and try not to go to an American school/university if they teach you bullshit like that(I'm not saying American schools are bad, but if they teach you that America is commonly the good guys then there's something very wrong with that school). America has shown a lot of support for dictators in history like in Vietnam, Congo, etc
I study history at university and every time America gets involved it's everything except positive. They're also fighting against an enemy they created... Bin Laden...

1 atom bomb was enough, Japan had lost the war and they surrendered quickly after the second atom bomb.

The only other solution(well not the only one, but this is what Russia wanted) was to organize a similar day like D-day, but they would need the help of Russia and there were already signs of struggle between American and Russia back then. It would also lead to more deaths FOR THE AMERICANS.

I can take a lot, but if someone is going to tell me that America is commonly the good guy in history then I do get pissed yes.

Did I say commonly?  No, I actually said some US presidents did a lot of slimey things.  However when you compare the lists the USSR was worse.  Which it was... you think the USSR was worse then the Nazis.  Do you think the US is worse then the Nazis?

As for 1 atom bomb being enough... go back and actually look at the records at the time.  They're actually available for you to look at at show you that 1 atom bomb WASN'T enough.  Japan's offer their military leaders had proposed was "We will surrender if you give us back a lot of shit you already took."

The military leaders had overtaken the emperor at that point and they had no intentions of giving up.

The Japanese leaders were not willing for an unconditional surrender... not until after the second bomb dropped.