Kenryoku_Maxis said:
From my experience, the (console) gaming market has done much better with only 2 major companies making consoles. This is better because third parties don't have to allocate as much resoruces to multiple versions of the same game or decide one console to 'support' over 3 (or 4) multiple consoles. If you only have 2 consoles to support, third parties will be more willing to make games for both AND there will be far more competition. There was much more competition between the NES/Master System, SNES/Genesis, and PSX/N64. When there's 3 (or more) systems, one ultimately gets pushed out and third parties hesistate to make major games for 2-3 years waititng till one 'wins'. |
Your respective reasonings are partially right, in my opinion. I believe that depending on the circumstances, the market and the companies' strategies, sometimes is better to have less companies, sometimes is better to have more.
For instance, in the past we saw great consoles and great games with less companies than now, but now the competition is very aggressive and, despite the criticized shovelware, we're seeing very good games.
"I think that I don't think."

- Soli Deo Gloria -
The FUTURE is the FUTURE. Now... B_E_L_I_E_V_E!







