Slimebeast said:
Yes.
Yes, I guess. It is kinda like magic. Or rather - I see it only like a description, sort of mathematically/like math does, about different phenomenons. Random is a descriptional term. But it's a nonsense statement when explaining things. Q: -'Why did the atom decay? Why did it decay at that point in time?' Q: 'why did the photon end up at position x at time y'? |
I don't see what is wrong with the first two answers really. The idea that a particle has a probability of being in any position is fairly fundamental to quantum physics - it allows for quantum tunnelling and explains the double slit experiment results. All of the evidence appears to point towards randomness existing.








