makingmusic476 said:
scottie said: tres - Man I would love to live in the world you do.
First off, will you at least recognise the magnitude of what you are saying? Both MS and Sony have occasionally stated in press releases that they paid for a game, moneyhatting is considered a valid tactic. Nintendo has never before moneyhatted a game... ever
When the PS1 took all of the big 3rd party exclusives from the N64. Nintendo did not moneyhat When the GC was selling buggerall and analysts were predicting Nintendo to become handheld only, Nintendo did not moneyhat Why would they moneyhat now? |
The Capcom Five say hello.
|
Capcom announced 5 games for the GC, cancelled one, released one simultaneous multiplat with the PS2, and later ported the other 2 of them to the PS2 with added features.
In what sense does this even remotely imply that Nintendo moneyhatted them?