johnsobas on 27 October 2009
| scottie said: tres - Man I would love to live in the world you do. First off, will you at least recognise the magnitude of what you are saying? Both MS and Sony have occasionally stated in press releases that they paid for a game, moneyhatting is considered a valid tactic. Nintendo has never before moneyhatted a game... ever When the PS1 took all of the big 3rd party exclusives from the N64. Nintendo did not moneyhat When the GC was selling buggerall and analysts were predicting Nintendo to become handheld only, Nintendo did not moneyhat Why would they moneyhat now? |
Nintendo has done a little moneyhatting like they did with RE on the GC, but it's obvious they need to moneyhat to get a game like that on GC. There is a possibility any game could be moneyhatted without us knowing it, but looking at the situation fairly Nintendo has considerable leverage over Sony in any negotiations for DQ. I don't need to repeat myself for the reasons why.
currently playing: Skyward Sword, Mario Sunshine, Xenoblade Chronicles X
