Gnizmo on 26 October 2009
| johnsobas said: i didn't say he didn't focus on the weapon, i said he didn't blame the weapon which is exactly what you said. You can't change the person, there's really very little to talk about there. The person is to blame, he can tell you that himself, and there is a chance that he would have died anyway obviously. You can't get rid of all the murders, every place in the world has murder. However if there is any chance the kid would have survived it is worth it. |
"All I am going to say is the gun led to the death" That is blaming the weapon. There is no way around it. Have all parents under go anger management classes and the kid has an even greater chance for the kid to survive. Not one of you have even thought of suggesting that. I will not tell you what to post. I will tell you what I will not allow to go unchallenged. Blaming the gun, or twisting this story to fit some anti-gun agenda is the most repulsive thing I can imagine.
