By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

You're doing a wrong assumption and you'll continue to do so, even if I taught you the fundamentals of taxonomy beyond the levels of what you know. The fallacies in your reasoning are so blatant that there was actually no need to debate them, I indulged in this debate, hoping to shed some light on the flaws of your reasoning, but I see that you are so held on onto them, it makes no difference to you if you're right or if you're wrong.

Then I just ask you this, as I asked you in the earlier posts I made. You consider Turn Based RPG's to be strategy games due to the micromanagement. Seeing that nowadays FPS games have a heavily based level up system that takes up for most of it's gameplay, which involves skill micromanagement, character development and customization, do you consider FPS to be strategy games too? This question will prove the fallacies of your reasoning, as you have tried to avoid it for the duration of this thread, since i'm going with your same categorization and using your reasoning skills as well.

Oh, and one more thing, you probably learned taxonomy on school. A shame that you're using basic knowledge to categorize something that it's clearly out of your scope. If you're interested to learn more about taxonomy I can indulge you even further, not in this thread since it will take longer than a measly post since i've done a 10 page essay on biological and microbiological categorization in my last year.



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"