By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
everdom said:
Gnizmo said:
Killergran said:

If I actually tried to kill someone with a rock from a distance greater than 3 meters, people would be more likely to laugh at me than run screaming. And if I would kill for a $60 videogame, imagine how obsessed I would be about my $20,000 car.

Except he wasn't 3 meters away. He wasn't 3 feet away. He was right next to the father.

@Johnsobas
Many of those items would be conviniently located. All the same, your argument falls into the "not a fair fight" category and that is not a good defense.

Ok im willing to bet you that if he didnt have a gun his son would still be alive, its not that other things cant kill, its that other implements arent designed specifically to shoot someone.

The man got the gun with intention to kill, if he didnt have that gun he would still have had the intention to kill, he would hae used and iron or a spoon if he wanted to or any object in the house