themanwithnoname said:
pbroy said:
MonstaMack said:
pbroy said:
MonstaMack said:
Well hopefully Fable 3 is a lot longer. I liked Fable 2 quite a bit but the length was far too disturbing. Oh, and on line interaction sucked. |
Longer is always better, but length shouldn't stop you from taking your time and enjoying the experience. n__n
|
Um... I put in 30+ hours and got all the achivements, and I heard the DLC is way over priced. I also pretty much explored every noke and cranny, and did just about everything evil to very good.
Thirty hours might seem like a lot to some people but not for a open world WRPG like Fable. It's a solid game but I don't believe it deserves any AAA recognition.
|
A serious answer for my innuendo. haha
As for the length of the game, I took my sweet time. put in over 200 hours. The DLC is pretty awesome too. Only have the first one, but stopped haflway through. Kind of wanted to savour it for a while, but haven't had the time to play it lately.
|
Whoa, really? That's pretty sweet, so I'm assuming you did all the major sidequests? I definitely think it is a game that the more time you put into it, the more you will get out of it.
|
I haven't done everything, most of them though. I spent lots of time in the whole landlording aspect of the game. Buying everything I could and putting the best furniture I could buy in all of the houses to make as much money as I can. I've bought every house/store/inn/castle possible. Buying the best furniture and trying to fill all of the houses with them takes lots of time.
