yushire said:
Zucas said:
yushire said:
Zucas said:
If user-generated content is the future of gaming, then wouldn't gaming no longer be anything like it is today. I like the idea of user-generated content but only in moderation. Otherwise I accept my limitations as a person and leave up the game making and content making to the "professionals". Although I could play some kid's platformer created on LBP, I'll take Miyamoto's New Super Mario Bros. over that any day.
So i like the idea of it but I don't want it to become the future in anyway. Just a option for those who want it and allow them to create all those crazy things. |
But it was optional, thats the beauty of it. Do you noticed that games that have UGC have the most number of levels? Boom Blox stages are what? 300+ in singleplayer alone? Sorry I didnt count but Im sure its 200+
|
Well it needs to be optional. Tell ya the truth, in almost every game I've had with this kind of ability, I have barely touched or not even used. Really when I buy a video game, I'm paying for the work the developer has done. Really it doesn't feel like a videogame when I'm working to make the game fun... for most level creators, that's what it feels like to me.
|
thats why its optional and thats why developers added level creators. Because people demands it. Even how sucky or good the levels are. I dint say that UGC will replaced traditional gaming but it certainly the future and a important part of gaming in the near future. If not, gaming companies will not invest on it. PC gaming was still alive because of mods...
|
I don't where you are getting in my argument that I don't want it to be optional. That's what I first mentioned. I'm just explaining my discontent with the feature to show that if does become a future or standard it won't be something I ever use.
All I hope is that it remains only optional as if it ever becomes the main focus of a game then that is not a good thing for the industry.
