ironman on 23 October 2009
| MissingNo said: What are you trying to prove? I don't get the point of this thread. 1. The 360 is cheaper initially but add up $60 per year you are going to have live (after 5 years that's $300, or the cost of a new elite console) and for the arcade you could throw on the cost of a hard drive if you want it and a wifi adapter if you prefer wireless. After just 3 years your $200 arcade console would cost ~$450 if you bought live every year and a hard drive. |
found right below argument #1 in OP.
"FACT: The PS3 is a cheaper console after adding up all the accesories (new, not used) so why is it behind the 360 in terms of total sales (or perhaps at an earlier time, current sales numbers.)"
