| ironman said: So, at risk of sounding like a fanboy, I have noticed a few rather inconsistan arguments on the forums, and was wondering if anybody could shed some light as to why people use them... 1 The PS3 is a cheaper console after adding up all the accesories (new, not used) so why is it behind the 360 in terms of total sales (or perhaps at an earlier time, current sales numbers.) FACT: The 360 has a lower initial price point, and many consumers don't bother adding up the add-on costs (new). 1. The PS3 is more expensive that the 360, and yet, it is still able to stay relatively close to it in terms of sales (not sure if this was total sales, or sales numbers at any given time.) FACT: The 360 is a more expensive consle when you add up the cost of add ons (new), and yet it is still ahead. ..........
|
Just fixed the first part of your OP, I think now it makes much more sense.
It is better to die on one's feet
then live on one's knees
