By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Paul said:
11ht11 said:
Paul said:
How many on the rail shooters can one system take? It's just ridiculous how many of these have been pumped out now. I bought both overkill and umbrella chronicles and will not drop another $60 on a game I get 10 hours of playtime out of. I spent $60 on COD:WAW and have played that for over 200 hours.

Third parties have never put a serious effort into the wii so they shouldn't bitch when the 10th on rail shooter for the system fails.

i disagree with that, some have and that certain game didnt end up selling


Name me a third party wii game and I'll come up with 5 games that developer put more effort into on the other systems.

You wrote "never", not "only 1/5 as many". Did you even pay attention to what you wrote?

 

theRepublic said:
Kasz216 said:

I've actually heard from people that it's buggy as hell. For example it will cut away when monsters are still there and they will kill you with you being unable to shoot them.

With two RE rail shooters and 2 HOTD rail shooters... why should anyone care about a glitched game.

I'm surprised it is getting good reviews.  I've heard the same about the monsters, and I've also heard that several of the weapons are waaaaay too strong.

 I'm wondering if actual gameplay doesn't matter anymore to some reviewers. As in did Madworld get good reviews for the gameplay or for looking like a stylized graphic novel? And the GTA IV reviews gushed about making this virutal world more than the gameplay.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs