Avinash_Tyagi said:
|
So let me see if I fallow you.
Banks were only lending out 60% of the population homes loans. The government comes along and says "we want that number to be 66%. Give that extra 6% home loans. and if the fail, we will cover you".
So the bank now has a risk free opportunity to make money They would be stupid not to take advantage of it.
Because we now have 10% more home owners, the cost of houses goes up. This is good for government (taxes), so they say to the banks "this is working well, go ahead and give 75% of the population loans, and we will cover any over 60%"
So banks do what government is telling them to do, and still, it's not governments fault?
What in a perfect would should the banks have done? Had someone come in for a home loan and tell them "You qualify under this government plan, but I just don't think you should have a house"?
I can just see that Bank exec at his share holders meeting "Yes, the government gave us the opportunity to make hundreds of millions of risk free dollars, but I just thought we should take the moral high ground, and not allow these people to buy homes".
Give me a break. Stop trying to rewrite history. Government screwed this one up.








