the problem isnt that they cant "co-exist" its that both are corruptable as in both you can have conflicting ideas and theories.
Edit: let me see if I can elaborate a bit here, okay, both Science and Politics have issues that they aim to address, however not all these have a definitive answer, some issues in both have conflicting ideas or theories behind them, in politics an example is the different theories on how best to run an ecenomy, in science its something like gloabal warming where some scientists look at there research and say "its affected by human activity" and others say "its not", you see the point im making? this becomes in a sense "corruptable" as politicians take sides on scientific debates too which in turn affects there policy stance(s).
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
