Acevil said:
Smashed said:
Acevil said:
Serious_frusting said:
Like what i said in another thread
Sony = Gaunteed top quality games constantly |
I know, I'm being a prick, but lair says otherwise! Honestly it is nice to see a company pay attention to the Quality of a game, Sony really picked up the ball with First and Second Party games (Ignoring Lair and even Heavenly Sword).
|
Your forgetting the main factor in all of this.
Lair was released in 2007, when the PS3 was STILL hard to develop for. Developers weren't used to it, everything was a lot of harder.
Don't you think that plays a factor in that? Making a quality game for a tough platform isn't always a walk in the park.
Uncharted 2 and Naughty Dog is a perfect example of a good developer that has knowlege and work on the platform.
|
We weren't talking about how hard it is, we are talking about how sony monitors quality in First Party and Second Party environment. Also Developers aren't allowed to use that excuse to explain why their game was bad.
|
It's a new platform to develop for, and they didn't have very much knowlege on it, WHY were you expecting a masterpiece such little in the generation? (2007). If you are new to something and say you didn't do a very good job because you didn't have very much knowlege on it.. That is certainly a legit excuse.
It's not like the Xbox 360, which is similar to the PC, and there are tens of thousands of PC developers, it is much easy to develop for. And most developers begin on PC then move onto consoles.
