HappySqurriel said:
Thinking about it, in many ways the XBox 360 not being around could make things much (MUCH) worse for Sony ... A large portion of the PS3's line-up right now is either multiplatform games or ports of XBox 360 games. Typically you'd expect that without direct competition these games would sell better on the PS3 and the PS3 would benefit from exclusivity, but I don't think you can make that argument. Without the XBox 360 many of these games would be delayed until the PS3's second year (waiting for a large-enough userbase); could you imagine how sparse the PS3's line-up would look if it lost 5 or 10 of the best multiplatform releases to date? How many people would be interested in the PS3 if it lost some of its key third party games? The thing that is often missed by these "If (a) didn't happen then the PS3 would dominate" thoughts is that you can't change one thing (XBox 360) without it having an impact on other things (third party support). |
Now you're just . I said it would influence 3rd parties and nothing about Sony domination.
Those 3rd party games wouldn't exist? No MS doesn't lead to the game industry just shutting down. Those multiplatform games would simply be different games, on one platform, or multiplatform on Wii.
I would think that the statement "a 2-way race would lead to some of the business going to the others" would be an easy comment, if not a tautology. Why would it lead to an argument?
Note: I'm a Nintendo loyalist and dislike Sony.







