By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TRios_Zen said:
naznatips said:
ckmlb said:
 

That's your opinion as in it's subjective not objective. In my opinion the quality is great and the problems are minor.

Technical issues are not subjective. You may like the gameplay better than me, but the fact that it's not a well-programmed game is not a debatable fact.

Based on the demo I'm buying this game for sure, I thought it was great fun and had a lot of style.  Axe work looked to get repetitive, but the style/story sold me on it anyway. That is completely my subjective opinion and I understand that, wouldn't try to convince anyone anyway.

My question to you though is what about the technical flaws have you grading it so much harsher than IGN?  Your comments lead me to believe that there are so many technical flaws it could not possibly be rated higher than an 8 (I *think* you said that), yet IGN, who I consider to be relatively thoughtful and consistent reviewers disagree with you (on that aspect). 

So I'm really looking for more information from you hear (honestly): what is so bad about in your opinion?

For the record, I played the whole demo (it was short) on the 360.

IGN is consistently high on review scores IMO.

I said it was a low 8s game, which is a great game, just with some major flaws. A 9 is a nearly perfect game, in all aspects, not just the style and presentation

Technical flaws I noticed were slowdown, screen tearing, and extensive and frequent loading screens.