Eurogamer reviews EyePet - 6/10

[Mirson]

CGI-Quality said:

jesus kung fu magic said:

CGI-Quality said:

Eurogamer isn't who I questioned though....

That's like me saying the score of Halo 3: ODST of 6/10 was justified because "X" website played it and said it was nothing more than an expansion pack. So in essence, how can he say it's justified if he's yet to play it? Basically, whether you think it or not, my question to Mirson is reasonable.

Him playing it has nothing to do with weather or not the score is justified (I have no idea why you even asked if he had played it ?)

Eurogamer gave a 6/10 with many reasons as to why it was and mirson thought they justified their score.......there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

 

He is saying that HE HIMSELF agrees with the score. How can he if he's yet to play it? Eurogamer has their reasons for thinking the game is average (once again, it isn't that hard to compute), and since they HAVE played it there's nothing to question there. But he has yet to play it, how can he know what's "justified" or not?

And going by my comparison, would it have been justified for me or anyone else who observed some of the ODST scores to consider them justified?

Um, no. I didn't say that I agreed with the score; I just said that they justified their score/review with the reasons they gave. Maybe you misunderstood what I wrote, or I worded it wrong.

As for your second paragraph, wtf are you trying to say?