By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zkuq said:
steverhcp02 said:
Zkuq said:
Maybe I've missed something... But isn't the only additional hardware Natal requires a camera of some sort? After all, it doesn't seem to require any magic wands or anything. To me, it would seem to be a software for the camera - and software is practically free once developed.

You are essentially saying the wii and sonys wands should cost more than natal, no?

I think you should do some research, friend.

Not necessarily more but Natal is definitely not as expensive as people seem to expect. All hardware it seems to require is a camera with a microphone, and that's not exactly expensive. MS can easily afford to include a camera in every console.

Research? Yours seems to be one that relies on your instincts instead of some actual research. In case you have made research, tell me where I'm wrong - don't tell me I'm wrong, instead tell me where I'm wrong and why.

Not taking stever's side here, but why must he tell you where you're wrong and why? You made a claim, YOU prove why you're right. If you think it won't be expensive, give numbers, facts, sheets, whatever instead of saying something and trying to make someone else discredit it (which will be hard for anyone, since no one knows exactly how much is pouring into the development of Natal)