MikeB on 10 October 2009
| Cypher1980 said: This is hilarious. 17 pages of whinging and WHY ? Because a game site loved a game, but didnt love it enough for people to be happy. |
I haven't read every page in this thread but IMO their comment is discussion worthy (I don't understand why some people criticize people bringing forward valid points), to requote myself:
I'm not worried about the score, it's good.
But their comments here are bogus, they gave Halo 3 a 9.8 (above industry average) and Gears of War 2 a 9.5 (again above industry average)..........
Uncharted 1 was very innovative, part 2 should of course be similar. Uncharted fans don't want Uncharted 2 to be like Call of Duty 8 renamed. Uncharted 2 provides the first multi-player platformer of its kind and provides many unique features not seen in a video game before.
But their comments here are bogus, they gave Halo 3 a 9.8 (above industry average) and Gears of War 2 a 9.5 (again above industry average)..........
Uncharted 1 was very innovative, part 2 should of course be similar. Uncharted fans don't want Uncharted 2 to be like Call of Duty 8 renamed. Uncharted 2 provides the first multi-player platformer of its kind and provides many unique features not seen in a video game before.
IMO this comment from them is complete and utter bogus...
IMO the weird inconsistent reasoning here was of Gamespot / Eurogamer (UK) - like proportions...
I hope GT with the criticism will be able to reflect upon itself and their history of reasoning. I would like to see more consistency from them, they are an important source for information.
