GT explains its Uncharted 2 score

[RageBot]

Majin-Tenshinhan said:

RageBot said:

Majin-Tenshinhan said:

I can't even fathom how this thread managed to get this far, or why GT felt the need to explain their score to begin with.

9.3 is a score that most game developers would kill for, so to the people saying "It's not fair to the developers!", just be quiet. 9.3 is an extraordinary, spectacular score.

And also, everyone keeps saying that "Omg you guys can't read it's not the score that's the problem!!". Oh, I'm so sorry, let me pinpoint what everyone is calling the real problem - Uncharted 2 getting a 9.3 isn't the problem, the problem is that Gears of War 2, Halo 3 and GTA4 got better scores. Oh no! I mean, it's impossible to enjoy something if one person in the world believes that something else is superior!

Now Naughty Dog will go out of business and nobody will buy Uncharted 2, because one individual believes that three other games are better.

Seriously, let this thread die because this is by far (very far) the most pathetic and worthless thread I've seen on VGChartz. (No offense to the TC, I'm talking about how the thread has developed and the subject itself, not to leo-j who created it).

You will understand how the thread got this far if you will actually bother reading, and understanding, what this thread is about, and forget the mantra of "oh lol PS3 fanboys cry because their game got a low score".

Great defense, try not using it on every person who doesn't agree with you. I read through the entire thread, and what it boils down to is that people are crying because Uncharted got a 9.3, but not that solely, people are fine with the score - Until they realize that Gears of War 2, and to a lesser extent, GTA 4 and Halo 3, got higher scores. That's what the entire thread has been about, and you can deny it all you want, but I spent the last 20-25 minutes reading through this thread of horror and I am well aware of what I read.

Second strike, one more and you're out :)

It isn't about the fact that they got a higher score, but it is about the REASON that GT sated they were given that score.

If they told, for example, that they prefer Sci-Fi settings, then yeah, it will make sense.

It doesn't make sense when they say that, in 2009, a game need to be innovative in order to get a score above 9.3, why it was 9.8 in 2008? Who knows.

It also means that, in GT, from now on, a game won't get a score above 9.3 if it doesn't innovate, and we both know that they won't abode by this rule.

And on another note - Great avatar :) I'm planning to play Juri in SSF4