Chairman-Mao said:
how do you figure it was rushed? It was amazing. Probably still the best graphical game this gen besides Killzone 2, Gears of war 2 or gran turismo 5. |
I played Uncharted 1 because sooooo many people on this site said it was one of the best games this generation and arguably the best game on PS3. Needless to say I was extremely dissapointed, It was gorgeous, yes, but I thought it was extremely repetitive, though it got pretty interesting towards the end, and very short, in fact, waaaaaaaay too short. I classify Uncharted 1 as "good" not "amazing". Uncharted 2 however, can be "amazing"
@iBlah
You act like i'm an Uncharted 2 hater, it's actually quite opposite, I'm anti-nonsense, I don't really hate anything but I do hate it when people tout things as being impressive when they are really not. I'm impressed ND has squeezed so much out of the Ps3, but it's still just improvements over the already established graphics engine that came with Uncharted 1(and probably resulted in the quality of Uncharted 1 faltering from what it could have been). And the online multiplayer, according to reviews i've read, was essentially copy pasted from other games. While it will be great fun, and look great, it's complete nonsense to be impressed that the sequel took 2 years to complete.
Super Mario Galaxy has probably seen about 2 years of development, and will look even better than Galaxy 1, pushing Wii hardware to the limits, but while i'm impressed that they managed to get so much out of the Wii, it's still just improvements over the original engine, and I don't think anyone is impressed that it took 2 years to make Galaxy 2, in fact I don't think it croseed anyones minds, neither should Uncharted 2.
