miz1q2w3e said:
Solid_Raiden said:
Wow. The op seems just as bad as the person who gave the game a 3. I agree that rating Halo 3 a 3 is very unrealistic. But to say that anyone who rates the game an 8 or lower is doing it to try and lower the average is just rediculous. I was pretty amazed to see Garnet give Gears of War 2 a score of 5 when it is imo the best game on 360 but it was his opinion and he is a 360 fan and most certainly not a fanboy of any other system. People just have a difference of opinion. But I think you are just as absurd as the people who actually do that because you actually believe that if people diagree with you and the media there is some hidden reason for their rating. |
i'm not saying everybody does this, quite the contrary, most people rate games fairly and media too, but take that 3 score for mario galaxy as an example, can you honestly say that you feel that the 3 score could be justified? honestly?? at what point do you say that it just isn't justified?
|
If you read what I said, I agreed that the score of a 3 was rediculous and was most likely done for the wrong reasons. But you saying somebody rating a game with a freakin 8 is also doing it for the wrong reasons is just rediculous. I for one rated Halo 3 a 7.5 but I could care less what rating it finally ends up with. To me, it was a mediocre game, and no public opinion or critic can tell me what games I can enjoy, love, dislike, or find mediocre.
