have you ever noticed THIS in the forums? especially in game raking threads

[Fame_Mcswagg]

miz1q2w3e said:

CGI-Quality said:

miz1q2w3e said:

Fame_Mcswagg said:
how was it so obvious to you? I'm just curious.

I guess it was judging by the post history of a voter who would give a pretty unresonable review, i mean a 3 is pretty easy to see but maybe a 7 or an 8 for a game that is clearly better than that would be "stelthier" like someone over in the Halo 3 thread posted.

and by 'clearly better' i mean by professional and amateur reviews, most people's opinion (who obviously played it and not someone who can't answer a simple question about a game), generally the opinion of a trusted person. and it's clear when even most fans of a competing console say it's good you know it's good :)

Here's  a question, who do you think in that thread, in particular, voted the game low "on purpose".

Also, try to understand, an 8 IS NOT that bad a score.....

I'd rather not say...

I think it is when you know the game's good and a few 8 scores could ruin a games average...

Like right now i'm in university, most of my grades are in the 90%+ region, so even if an 80 score seems good to you it isn't a "good" grade AT ALL to me. I have gotten grades in the 80% and once even in 70% and trust me they temporarily destroyed my GPA, until i retook those subjects that is ;)

but in a vote you can't "retake" a person's vote or choose to ignore it, That's what makes it even worse!

know a games good??? I don't know any game is good until I play it.... There was some pretty low scores with the other games that I didn't agree with but when people give reasoning behind there scores how can you not count them?