| windbane said: You said publishing games does not make you a good company. Well, you not liking sports game does not make them a bad company. They develop a lot of highly rated games. I agree that all the systems have their games. I'd say there are several games on the 360 that are overall better than Halo 3 (most games should have replays), but a few of those are also on the PS3. Galaxy is great but when Zack and Wiki is the only other game taking advantage of the Wiimote lately it's hard to be content imo. I'd say the Wii is still more of a backup console, but that's just my opinion. I do keep hearing that the PS3 has no huge title this fall but I'd put Uncharted in that category, CoD4 just came out, GT5: Prologue is coming out (beta already released in Japan which I plan to download just to stare at in awe), The Orange Box hopefully won't suck. I suppose GT is the only one that fits the "huge hitter" category, but that's only because I assume you mean sales and not game quality. It does hurt that MGS was delayed (months ago, of course), as well as many others, including Home (need achievements). Anyway, I am not attacking the Wii's overall lineup but it has been a little thin lately. Hopefully the game quality picks up this fall besides Galaxy (Zack and Wiki was a nice surprise and I think really suits the Wii). The only problem I have with the 360 lately is I'd rather play most of the games on the PC, but that goes for CoD4 for the PS3 as well. I'm glad The Orange Box is selling well because more people need exposure to the best FPS ever. Anyway, I agree that all systems have reasons to make people content. EA needs to get its act together, though. |
You see, when you create a good insightful post like this one that tackles other people's points and makes good ones of its own, it becomes very hard to argue.
That's a longwinded way of saying I agree with most of that except for the Wii=backup console of course. The PS3, IMO, looks more like the backup console thus far. ^_^
