By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
damndl0ser said:
MikeB said:
stika said:
MikeB said:
@ themanwithnoname

Here you are:

http://news.spong.com/article/18155/Lionheads-Project-Natal-Video-Fakery

http://gamer.blorge.com/2009/06/07/exposed-natel-milo-smoke-and-mirrors-by-peter-molyneux/

I take your two no-named websites milo negative previews and raise you two positive IGN and eurogamer previews

I wasn't saying the fake was a bad fake. Note that at VGChartz my initial repsonse was very positive towards Natal.

But IMO they should have waited until they had something real to show. Now it just looked like they wanted to attract interest towards something which still had very little basis. Not good for real existing innovations which get fewer attention at the show.

A quick question for you, were you bashing Sony for doing the exact same thing with its PS3?  I remember the year the 360 was launched Sony was spewing so much fake shit it wasn't funny.  Trying to get people to just wait for their super computer PS3 most awesome c3ll tech invention of all time.  Sigh....

 

Some how I don't think you were.

Heh heh.  Now that's how you do it.

@MikeB

To  be completely fair, Microsoft HAD to show it this early to give developers time to work out ideas on how to implement it and, smartly, to give proper time for interest to seep into the public conciousness so that when it does get closer to launch even more people will be aware that its coming and had been anticipating it for a long, long time.

And what are those "real existing innovations" (since you don't feel Natal is one) that got overlooked at E3 2009?