| famousringo said: I'm gonna perch on a fence and not decide for now. I do think that Obama has done enough for peace to deserve consideration, but he could do much, much more. “Very few leaders if at all were able to change the mood of the entire world in such a short while with such a profound impact. You provided the entire humanity with fresh hope, with intellectual determination, and a feeling that there is a lord in heaven and believers on earth.” Mr. Peres, who won the peace prize with Yitzhak Rabin and Yasir Arafat in 1994 following the Oslo Accords, added: “Under your leadership, peace became a real and original agenda. And from Jerusalem, I am sure all the bells of engagement and understanding will ring again. You gave us a license to dream and act in a noble direction.” Does a change in the mood and new hope for the future justify a peace prize? I'm really not sure. |
Here's the thing. I think Hilary Clinton would of did that as well.
Pretty much anybody not George W Bush or seen as him would of did that.
It feels like George W Bush was such a disaster that the next guy gets an award just for not being him.
Since nothing he's done has reached a level of other Presidents not named George W Bush or like... James Buchanon or something.








