Kasz216 on 09 October 2009
| Rath said: I believe he will deserve it, but it is premature. If he can follow through on his promise to close Guantanamo, if he can successfully engage Iran in meaningful diplomacy, if he can reduce the number of nukes in the world, if he can get Israel and Palestine back into negotiations. They are at the moment all if's. If he can do any of those he will have earnt his award. I honestly believe he can and will do some of those but I think the award would have been better given in retrospect than in expectation. |
Iran I agree with... depending on what it accomplishes.
The rest I don't. Guantamo really isn't big enough... espiecally considering what other applicants have done.
Nuclear Disarmerment is something that's largely been in the works for a long time already... Clinton would deserve more of an award here then Obama likely.
And Israel and Palsetine... more needs to be done then "Back in negotaitions."
I mean... at the moment the goal is to get them back to where Clinton had them... if he does this stuff he wouldn't be doing more then Clinton did.
