By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
madskillz said:
Kasz216 said:

So... your argument is basically.

He should win the Nobel Prize because he's not George W Bush.  In that case... pretty much every US president should be getting a Nobel Prize from here on out.

When else did the Nobel Prize people get it wrong? 1994. 

Also the complete snub of Gandi... who deserved a Nobel prize possibly more then anybody ever.

There are tons of other more qualified candidates out there.

Also... you know these aren't the same people all the time right?  The Nobel Prize commission changes.

No, sir. Woodrow Wilson was the last sitting U.S. president to win it. He did it in 1919.

Who won it in 1994?

And yes, Gandi did deserve it. I won't deny that. But ... my question stated did Obama deserve it or not? That's all.

I just find it so funny that some GOPers and the Tailban agree on something. That's soooooo laughable.

No.   He didn't.  He hasn't actually done anything.

A good candidate for next year possibly if he actually closes down guantanamo and accomplishes some stuff.

Most people actually believe Obama doesn't deserve it.  Hell the White House seems to indicate THEY don't believe they deserve it.  If you'll notice their official response has been abject shock.

Heck, the only reason you've given in this thread is that he uses diplomacy... like pretty much every world leader, and every president we've had except one or two.