Greatest scientific evidence for evolution?

[Dr.Grass]

OMG. Look this tread is not helping anyone, but I've got to make some comments.

Archeology:
"Look, fossils are had to argue against, we have found repeatedly and with good stead the same story over an over again, life evolves. Have we ever found a dinosaur and a human in the same place dated at the same time? No. "

YOU DON'T KNOW JACK SHIT ABOUT ARCHEOLOGY DO YOU!!??? If you knew anything at all then you would know that the fossil record is in shambles. There are hardly any ape-men fossils, and MANY experts argue strongly that the fossils are either ape or human and not a cross breed. We're not talking about a fully formed fossil as the ignorant imagine. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A SINGLE THIGH BONE IN SOME CASES. Evolutionists have proposed whole new species just on a thigh bone to fill in the blanks. COMPELLING EVIDENCE INDEED.

AND HERE COMES THE MOST IRONIC THING: There HAVE been many sites with both human and dinosaur fossile side by side. They've just been covered up. Read FORBIDDEN ARCHEOLOGY.

Then we have to deal with posts like:
"Yea I can't necessarily cite off any evidence right now (too lazy) but some of the best evidence we have now is backed up in DNA evidence. I think this is really what has convinced many that this is a credible explanation for the origin of species. It's hard to argue DNA evidence haha. Not to mention evolution has been studied and tested numerous times and been proven correct every single time."

I'm sure he knows jack about DNA. Did all cars come from the same source just because they share the same features/parts? There are other explanations. And this is what stupid F*#+ING poeple just don't get: Just because the evidence suits the model doesn't mean the model is right. MAYBE THE MODEL WAS DESIGNED TO FIT THE EVIDENCE. HOW CAN THE EVIDENCE THEN PROVE THE MODEL?

Maybe if any of you actually had a science degree then I would take you seriously.