justinian said:
I have nothing to back this up either way, it was just the impression I got and I wasn't even on the PS3 bandwagon. |
I'll add that I do feel that Edge are sometimes a little inconsistent with their critera - again though I think this is per individual rather than any conspiracy. For example sometimes one reviewer will verbally pernalize a title (and in the score, too) for being too safe and similar to it's predecessors, while another reviewer will ignore the lack of innovation from one franchise title to another nor mark down because of it.
For whatever reason, the numbers do seem to show the PS3 titles have ended up more on the receiving end than others, but then again, in the end, despite being from a single source the reviews are produced by individuals and as such will vary in approach, particularly given Edge doesn't use a formal template but a written review (which I like) an a simple number score (which I don't).
So for example, the guy reviewing GTA IV and Halo 3 might well see everything he wanted based on earlier titles plus a nice new sheen of polish, and give high scores. The guy reviewing MGS4 might see a highly polished title that didn't innovate enough for him, and mark slightly lower score.
Ideally, the reviews editor should watch out for any excessive deviations, but no Editor is going to pull up one review for being slightly tougher in judging innovation, or repetition, or graphics, vs another.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...







