For me Edge and Eurogamer are the only reviewers whose scores hold any weight. IGN and GT throw 9's about all over the place and so their scores really don't distinguish the good games from the great. I also like that Edge and Eurogamer stick to whole number scores as opposed to decimals. How are you supposed to be able to judge a game to that degree? I doubt anyone can really tell if a game is 1% better than another. As long as you follow Edge's system then you realise that a 7 or 8 is still a good score.
I do disgaree with a few of their scores though, Halo and GTA are too high in my opinion but then again I'm just not that keen on those games. I also think Killzone, MGS4 and Valkyria Chronicles should be a little higher but I accept that reviwers opinions are going to differ from mine now and again.
