Rath on 08 October 2009
Fair enough, that last insult was fairly petty =P. I just find it amusing that someone is claiming the fossil record is a scam =P.
In any case those sources are not meant to be in depth - they are to give an overview of a subject, something that wikipedia is fine for.
If I were posting detailed evidence of anything I wouldn't use wikipedia, but it really is very good for giving a general overview of something.
However if you want;
http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/lenski.html
http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fhc/hyraco1.htm
