By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NeoRatt on 06 October 2009
Edit Thread
ocnkng said:
NeoRatt said:
MetalGearSolid_4ever said:
LBP is british, british = marks on edge
Halo, WRPGs = marks on edge
360 exclusives = marks on edge

Anything else (except VERY few titles) = not so much marks on edge
This review must have being wrote when they were not drunk.
I will consider them unbiased the day Uncharted 2 recieves a 9 or higher that it deserves.


Halo Wars = 8/10

Mass Efect = 7/10

Fallout 3 = 7/10

Lost Odyssey = 7/10

Hardly call that Microsoft biased.  Looking a Mass Effect and Fallout 3 it doesn't look they are too biased toward WRPGs as well.

LBP got high marks from almost everyone.

Edge has an very high standard for games.  I prefer that over most of the other reviewers who give a minimum of 8 for almost every game.  At least they stand for what they believe.  When you see a 9 or 10 on Edge the game gets instant respect.

Fallout 3 is multi plat.

I'd suggest not going into the direction of debating weather Edge is biased or not coz the fact is that they have tremendous skew in their review scores for 360 and PS3 exclusives.

Don't believe me? Check this statistical comprison below.

http://www.smgamers.com/?p=1227

I think IGN appears to be most biased by the charts in favour of PS3 and Wii... That's the problem with charts...  You can read what you want to read into them...

I pointed out Fallout 3 because it is a WRPG.  And you said they favour them.  But the evidence appears contrary based on Mass Effect and Fallout 3 scores.

I think Edge favours good multi-player games that have solid campaigns.  They hammer games that don't have both.  To me, a game should be rated based on what is in the box.  If there is no multi-player it should not be slagged for not having it.  But, Edge consistently hammers games that lack multi-player (for the most part).