MaxwellGT2000 said:
Hrm I really have no idea how the rights work for websites and domain names, I know the whole reason why IGN changed to IGN was the request of Nintendo because their Nintendo 64 section was N64.com, many people thought it was the offical site for N64 and not the Nintendo site. It was a request not a case with lawyers and such, I have seen some companies force people to give up domain names that way but its usually terrible for their own Rep and they'd rather work it out without making a big deal out of it IE cutting a deal with said domain owner. |
Na, when its big corporation its actually fairly polite on initial contact, sorta like 'please do this before we begin litigation to make you stop doing this' kinda 'threat that is not a threat'. It only begins to become an issue if the fella resist. Most fansite are given the same treatment, although some could be fairly callous about the whole thing as some of these cases are outsourced.
I think one case that made the news in the UK a while back was about a 10 year old girls who got notice from lawyers demanding that she take down her pokemon fansite. Boy was that a sob story... :P