Killergran on 05 October 2009
I find that the reasoning of the article is sort of backwards.
If I'm promised a pay of $100 and a bonus of $50, I would be pretty mad if my boss told me that I only got $50 and a bonus of $50 with the motivation that: "I could give you $100, but then I couldn't give you the bonus"
I mean, really? I don't care all that much what the resolution is, but it seems to me that if you promise one resolution, then OBVIOUSLY that should include all benefits of post processing. The cry "But it looks better with this effect than without!" smells of whining. Not because it isn't true, but because it was supposed to be there without a drop in resolution. And then it would have looked even better.
This is invisible text!
