MAFKKA said:
ironman said:
MAFKKA said:
But since "most" is not synonym for "all". You can't say that its exclusive, which is a total word. An absolute word. Exclusive can not be ONLY in some cases and Multiple in others.
|
Ah ye old symantecs argument, you must be getting despirate. Anyway, I used "most" to cover my ass. See, while I am pretty sure that all games that are on both the PC and the 360 must be run in a MS environment, there could be one or two that do not. Anyway, those would be anomolies, all the rest are still exclusive.
Edit: A few fun definitions by my man Webster
Game Console - n.
"and electric device for playing VIDEO GAMES, requiring a connection to a television."
Computor - n.
"A device that computes, especially a programmable electronic machine that performs high-speed mathematical or logical operations or that assembles, stores, correlates, or otherwise processes information."
So you see, I can play your game!!! According to these definitions, a computer is by nature, NOT a console.
|
So.. proven wrong with GFW. So we can drop that.
And second. I agree. But i've never claimed it to be a console? So i dont see your point when we're talking about whether or not something can be called exclusive, when its devided, multiple and shared.
|
I hope you mean YOU were proven wrong with GFW because all the games that are on both the PC and the console ARE GFW as far as I know. And yes, you did claim it was basically a console to try and prove your point that PC games were not exclusive. None of the PC/360 games are divided multiplied or shared outside of the MS platform...not intentionally. I mean, if you really want to go down the lynux rout, then I guess the PS1&1, the Xbox, and the Gamecube all have absolutely NO exclusives since a person can hack a 360 or PS3 to play games from all those consoles.
