ironman on 03 October 2009
| MAFKKA said: @ ironman - there's just too many exceptions, maybes, depending on this and that etc.. for your logic to be successful. It dosent add up. Exlusive is and have always been defined as Single or Only. And not divided or shared with others; ex. "they have exclusive use of the machine"; "sole rights of publication" There's really no need to try and bend the definition just so it'll work with what you're trying to achieve. |
No, there really are not many exceptions, very few if any games that are shared by the PC and the 360 are sactioned for use outside of an MS product. thus it is an MS exclusive. As for your deifinition of "exclusive" you are correct. An MS "exclusive" game is not divided amungst non MS OS or gaming machines. It would seem that you forget MS is a singular company and as such, fits the definition of exclusive perfectly.
@dobby, Yes, it is, if it is a port from the 360, in most cases, it will only work on a computor with a MS operating system, and it is officially branded by MS.
