SciFiBoy said:
SamuelRSmith said:
SciFiBoy said:
kowenicki said:
@scifi
no... i agree, they are pointless. |
exactly, most of the media have already pretty much backed Cameron, why bother in having a debate, when the media plan on ignoring the result unless it favours him, its stupid
also, the UK has a party system, its not about the individuals, its about the POLICY'S ffs
another point, surely given the opinion polls show support for smaller parties on the rise, they should also have the leaders of the smaller party's and stuff on there?
|
People have been voting based on the personality of the leaders since the 70s, it's about time the system caught up.
|
1. Why?
2. How?
3. You honestly think the debate would have an effect on media bias?
|
1 - It's just the way things have been trending since Thatcher. You're studying politics, now, right? You'll probably cover it when discussing the concept of "presidential-prime minister"
2 - What what?
3 - Where did I say anything about that? But I don't see how a live feed of pre-approved questions could suffer from much bias, especially as their being conducted by three broadcasters that are different on bias.
