Poor AI = confirmed, the PC demo demonstrated pretty well how stupid the AI was. For instance I was defending a tank against an onslaught of terrorists so what are the terrorists doing? Firing their IEDs at me or lobbing one of their billions grenades they apparently keep in a extra-dimensional pocket....instead of firing them at the tank they are trying to take out or lobbing a grenade at the group of guys huddled about the tank etc...
With that said it is a very fun game and its probably a lot of fun to play multiplayer with the perks etc...and its is a title that I am and have been looking forward to for a long time on my PC..I say that because I don't want to hear any BS from PS3/360 fans bitching that I am bashing it for that reason...no I am saying what I think nothing more...nothing less....
And so I completely and totally agree with Naz, if they have complaints of short campaign, no vehicles, bad AI, poor cover system, and lack of MP modes then there is no way it is a 9.4 game and only further goes to show that my anti-review score standpoint is justified.
After reading the IGN review and watching the GT review I am still going to get the game but I have no illusions about aspects of the game that would have been very disappointing had I only looked at the scores. Because a 9.4 tells me that almost everything is spot on with maybe one or two hangups..but not a list of hangups like they gave at GT.
Having played the demo I have a bit of insight into what they were referring to with the grenade indicator issues and how much of a pain in the ass it is with guys constantly lobbing grenades at you like they have an infinite supply.
 |
| To Each Man, Responsibility |
