JamesCizuz on 29 September 2009
| NeoRatt said: I'm sure that the game is awesome... But, to give a 10/10 when you say "Whether or not the multiplayer sticks, however, is arguably a footnote" seems to be non-10-ish to me... I feel games should be rated on what is in the package. If they just shipped a single player campaign then maybe it should have got a 10... But, they included a multi-player game as well and it should be rated as part of the game... To me, the campaign sounds like it is 10 or near a 10. Nobody has really been raving about the multi-player yet. It sounds strong, but is it CoD strong? Nobody seems to want to talk about that much. |
What is said can be said for ANY multiplayer that is not safe. By safe I mean Halo, CoD, etc. It's tried and tested multiplayer people like, not the best but gets the job done. Halo, and CoD, only useing these as they are the most popular, are not the best multiplayer. Not close. But they get extremely popular, for whatever reason. They are not bad, in fact I love em both, but we can all agree better multiplayer is out there. When this is said, it means a game has obscure multiplayer which might be a blast, however not catch on.
