| Zucas said: Well know I'm logical because I openly admitted that my knowledge of cricket was lacking. You are illogical because you don't know much about baseball yet you continue to speak out of your ass about it. That's the difference. I don't deal with illogical arguments which is why I'm not going to respond to the rest. My point in this thread was to notate what was illogical and explain why others don't have to deal with how illogical it is. Clearly starting an argument off by showing bias is never a way to make a good argument. Actually you should have stopped there. Or simply done as I had, given one side, and then admitted ignorance to ther other side. That owuld have made you logical. Instead you defied socratic wisdom, and were shown how illogical it came out to be. |
First off, let's just be cool about it! I respect your views but I just think you misread something I was trying to get across
My OP said:
"let's dedicate this thread to points that contribute to each game's merits."
"Anyhow I could write forever about this, I'll leave the rest up to you."
Shouldn't that speak for itself? If you said your views without calling me illogical then that's fine because you were adding points to the discussion, which was the intent.
I know just about everything about baseball, please don't say I don't just because I didn't state everything in the OP (which was stated) :(
