CGI-Quality said:
End of the day, I was elaborating on why people are getting at him. His posts have, in the past, been rather against Sony. Whether it was mild or not, that isn't up to me, but the observation was there. It 's not a big deal now, but it DOES make it seem fishy when he has something particularly negative to say about one of PS3's games. I said he was entitled to his opinion though, and applauded his subjectivity. If you read through the thread, you'd know that I was actually defending him. However, I know why people got on his case. I also understand why you are defending him. There are two sides to every story, I've heard both and gave the most reasonable response to the situation. |
I understand that you were trying to be the voice of reason, and my post wasn't directed at you (although I admit it seemed that way). It was meant for everybody that was complaining about Mirson's post history and attempting to get his vote stricken from the records.
Mirson is being harped upon due to his "low" score and his perceived anti-PS3 post history, while those who gave the game perfect are not being scrutinized, even though a couple of them have a well documented pro-PS3 history. Bias goes both ways, and going through Mirson's post history to make sure he isn't biased and not going through theirs, or everyones for that matter, is both unfair and hypocritical.
Again, I'm not directing this to you personally, I'm just trying to flesh out my opinion on the matter.







