Kasz216 said:
A) No they are not cheaper B) Wind and Solar are great... when the wind is blowing, the sun is shining... and there is room. Where praytell is England going to find the massive room needed for solar and wind farms in England? What are they going to do when the wind isn't blowing and it's overcast? C) Wind and Solar are nowhere near the level of efficency to work huge power grids by themselves, and even if they did they need backup systems... and they won't be able to work everywhere because you need very specific conditions to drop down windfarms or solar farms. Using Solar is going to end up burning more fossil fuels then Nuclear will in the long run. You know... for the rest of the quote you cherry picked. it won’t be all of their business by far. We’ll still be using oil, we’ll still be using gas, we’ll still be using coal. But we’ll be using those at far diminished levels than we are today.” By far? So... what... 50% fossil fuels... at least? |
Ok, are you willing to store spent nuclear fuel under your bed? In your car boot? in your backyard?
Didn't think so.
When someone comes up with a reasonable way to dispose of nuclear waste AND makes building the plants cost effective, THEN I will accept it as a viable alternative.
Switch: SW-5066-1525-5130
XBL: GratuitousFREEK







