ssj12 said:
GS.com isn't a B&M retailer now is it. You rarely see PC games at their retail outlets and never see used PC games since it can't happen ever. They can run DD sales out their website, but they do tend to refuse to sell phyisical media that contains competitors products. http://www.edge-online.com/news/digital-remains-biggest-threat-gamestop http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/57111 of course this does not mean GameStop couldn't have a change of heart considering the future. Their CEO does seem to be becoming a bit more open to the idea of DD. Even though he still wants to rip customers faces off with used game pricing. (Pay-and-Trade is so much cheaper and is running my local GS out of business). Still that $20 Patapon is being held up in price due to retailer influence and distribution costs. If a publisher didn't pay UPS or Fedex to deliver their games to Day 1 to GameStop or WalMart or any other retailer and instead could just male a bunch of box-art sheets and DLC codes it would cut costs to nearly 95% making it so the cost of the game isn't based on what publishing/advertising costs are rather development and advertising costs that $20 Patapon title just because a $10 Patapon title that can see another price cut once all other costs are paid off. |
This entire Gamestop argument is ridiculous on your part. I've already presented that Gamestop does DD, and then you say it doesn't count because their retail stores don't embrace it? Why would a retail store embrace DD? That doesn't make sense. Gamestop as a company has embraced it the same way every other DD service operates...on the internet through a website. End. Of. Story.
Your two links don't say anything about Gamestop hating DD. The first has a man working for GS saying that DD is a challenge for their retail business, but with them opening up a DD service on GS.COM, it seems their strategy is to embrace it and be a big dog on both fronts. Your second link should be obvious. Since GS.com operates a DD service, why would they sell a product that requires a competitor's DD service to run? That seems more like the fault of THQ and Red Entertainment for favoring a DD service over the others. Why would Verizon sell the iPhone when you have to sign with AT&T to use it? I'm sure if Dawn of War II didn't require a Steam membership to run the DRM, it wouldn't have been singled out by GS. Give me more Steam games GS has banned, and I'll provide you 20 games they both share for every one GS doesn't allow to be sold. Got any other lame links to prove a company currently practicing a website with a DD service hates that very same service?









